Please note-

*Please note- Your browser preferences must be set to 'allow 3rd party cookies' in order to comment in our diaries.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Mickey Rourke: Rugby star Gareth Thomas had great courage to come out as gay

Gareth Thomas
Hollywood actor Mickey Rourke has been speaking about his quest to play openly gay rugby star Gareth Thomas on the silver screen.
The rugby player, who came out a year ago, remains the only top level out gay sportsman in Britain today.
Speaking to the openly gay comedian Alan Carr on his Chattyman Channel 4 programme, Rourke said: “To be a man who plays rugby who is gay and to live with that secret for the amount of years that Gareth [Thomas] had, to perform at the high level that he performed at, it takes a lot of courage.”
The star got the idea for making a film about Thomas after reading about the Crusaders player coming out late last year.
A spokesman for Thomas said: “Mickey Rourke is a big rugby fan and was flying to New York from London recently when he read an article about Gareth and thought he would be the perfect model for a film.
Mickey Rourke received an Oscar
nomination for his role in the Wrestler
“Mickey contacted Gareth by a mutual friend in rugby league to express his interest and invited Gareth to watch the Jonathan Ross show and meet him for dinner afterwards.
“The fact that Mickey is so passionate about doing a picture has been really flattering and although we haven’t come to an agreement yet we’re really hoping it does happen.”
Rourke, 57, is understood to have been wanting to make a rugby-themed film for some time.
A veteran Hollywood star, he made his comeback in The Wrestler in 2008, for which he won an Oscar nomination.
He was criticised last year for calling a reporter a “faggot". Despite being attacked by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, he refused to apologise for using the homophobic slur and later said: “I don’t really give a f**k. Life’s too short.”

-end-

St. Patrick's Church (Gymbie, Australia): Where Christmas Mass Is the Best Time of Year to Bash Gay Marriage

By Michael A. Jones -

For many, Christmas mass is a yearly tradition. It's also one of the few times each year (Easter being the other one) where the pews are jam packed with people who don't regularly make weekly mass pilgrimages. The festive season has a way of bringing out even the most lapsed Catholics, looking to tap into the peaceful vibe that comes with celebrating the birth of someone someone who Christians view as, well, the Prince of Peace.
But at St. Patrick's Church in Gymbie, Australia, one pastor decided to use the heightened mass attendance level to blast same-sex marriage. Forget the whole peace on Earth and mercy mild sentiment. At Fr. Pat Cassidy's parish, it's the most wonderful time of the year to condemn gays and lesbians.
The Christmas services went a little something like this: folks walked in, put their fingers in the holy water bowl, and promptly got handed a petition urging them to contact their legislators to oppose same-sex marriage. Mass started, and the priest mentioned the importance of Catholics to stand united against same-sex marriage. Then, during the homily, the priest talked about how Christmas is a time to celebrate family, and same-sex couples are not compatible with the Church's definition of family. Then Mass ended, with one final plea to stop the evil scourge of same-sex marriage from washing up on Australia's shores.
Quite the homophobic show that parish leaders thought would have maximum impact. There's just one problem with that: the people in the pews, who came to the service to celebrate one of the most joyous times of year? They were livid that the Church would use Christmas as a vehicle for bashing gays.
"I was disgusted that such discriminatory and hateful comments were expressed at a children’s mass,” said Brisbane resident Leah Scullen. She had been considering converting to Catholicism, but was so turned off by the Church's decision to use the Christmas holiday to focus on same-sex marriage, she's now looking elsewhere for a faith outlet.
Another resident, who chose to remain anonymous because she attended mass with her gay brother and his partner, said that this was a tactless decision by the Church that won't win it any fans.
"I respect what the Catholic Church is saying but at Christmas time you don’t expect to get that shoved in your face,” she said. Her gay brother was even less sparing.
"In his homily, the priest talked about loving your family and forgiveness ... what Jesus was all about, but in the next breath he talked about how gay marriage is wrong. For me, it wasn’t about understanding the teachings of the Catholic Church. Of course it’s not going to be pro gay marriages but surely there are better topics to raise at Christmas," he said.
Seriously. Like the major wars being fought all over the world. Or the global economic crisis. Or worldwide poverty, climate change, the suffering of those living in the wake of natural disasters ... and the list goes on and on.
What's the takeaway here? Well, first is that some church leaders know no depths to their homophobia, which is why Fr. Patrick Cassidy, who justified the decision to use Christmas Mass as a venue for denouncing gay marriage, should hear from folks. But secondly? The fact that so many people were not only turned off by the Church's decision to parlay Christmas mass into homophobia, but felt compelled to speak out about it, shows that equality is winning out here. And it confirms what we've long known: that folks in the pews are miles away from the institutional church on the issue of gay rights. As more and more Catholics welcome and embrace LGBT people and same-sex couples into their families, that's only a trend that will continue.

-end-

Why Gay Republicans Need To Come Out

By Andrew Belonsky -

GOP leaders are currently embroiled in a back room war over whether or not Michael Steele should be replaced as party chairman. While a few people are standing behind Steele, most want to see him ousted, and a number of hopefuls have emerged.
Rather than taking the Republican party in a new direction, however, these contenders want to toe the anti-gay line that's worked so well in the past. If gay Republicans want to save their party, they'd better speak up.
"[Same-sex marriage] devalues the relationship that is shared by my wife and I and a number of committed married couples," said former RNC political director and current chair contender Gentry Collins.
Another hopeful, Saul Anuzis, insisted, “Marriage is an institution that has been around for 3,000 years. It's part of our faith. It's part of our culture. It's important to have a mother and a father … People care that you're a family person.”
One of the many female candidates, Ann Wagner, echoed Anuzis' sentiment: "I think that's where the American people are. They believe in traditional marriage ... It's important that we hold true to those tenants and values that I think are a pillar of our Republican party and our platform.”
But that pillar's no longer bearing the load it did in the past.
More and more young Republicans are embracing equality -- about 60% of GOP adherents under 30 say gays and lesbians should be able to wed.
Despite this trend the GOP and their allies continue to trumpet a discriminatory ideology, one that now blends traditional social conservatism with timely fiscal concerns, an idea Steele himself helped start earlier this year.
"Now all of a sudden I've got someone who wasn't a spouse before, that I had no responsibility for, who is now getting claimed as a spouse that I now have financial responsibility for," Steele said of how the GOP could frame gay marriage. "So how do I pay for that? Who pays for that? You just cost me money."
As the RNC looks for its new leader, GOP leaders Mike Huckabee, Rep. Michele Bachmann and soon-to-be House Speaker John Boehner are throwing their support behind long-time Republican allies the Family Research Council, the American Family Association, and the National Organization for Marriage, which the Southern Poverty Law Center qualified as a "hate group" for their consistent attacks on LGBT equality.
"We, the undersigned, stand in solidarity... pro-family organizations that are working to protect and promote natural marriage and family," they write in the mass letter. "We support the vigorous but responsible exercise of the First Amendment rights of free speech and religious liberty that are the birthright of all Americans."
Rather than embracing the future, these men and women are grasping at the past, trying to sustain a political plot that's no longer tenable.
There are signs that these traditional groups could be edged out, however. Gay Republican groups like GOProud and individuals like former RNC Chair Ken Mehlman or Fred Karger, a gay presidential contender, are making themselves more visible on the party's scene.
Karger regularly explains that his candidacy's as much about winning as it is raising his party's awareness of LGBT issues: "If I do nothing else, to kind of make this issue, to put a face on this issue as opposed to what happened in previous elections like 2004 where the gay community was getting used as a political tool to strengthen the president’s reelection."
GOProud has also worked to elevate its profile, and today released a statement about the RNC election. Said chairman Chris Barron in a statement, "For conservatives, and anyone else who cares about the future of the Republican Party, this vote should be an easy one – anyone but Michael Steele."
While certainly Barron and his peers have a responsibility to make their voices heard among the din of anti-gay Republicans, their stance against Steele comes as rather impotent when viewed against the other Chair contenders' comments.
If gay Republicans are truly committed to their political party, then they owe it to the GOP to steer it toward a more inclusive future, because there's little chance the Republicans can thrive by maintaining the same old ideas. Republicans who either remain quiet in the closet or on the sidelines do so at the peril of not only their party's survival, but its moral center, as well.
As Mehlman, who came out earlier this year, said, "If you think about some pretty important issues that we all believe in, whether it's freedom, whether it's, frankly, the value of community... the freedom to marry, the right to marry, it's consistent with the Republican philosophy to be supportive of two adults who love each other -- whether they be gay or straight -- having the right to get married."
No, Mehlman's not perfect, but at least he's speaking out against his party's entrenched exclusion. And that alone is a step in the right direction.

-end-

Jewish Youth Groups Take On Anti-Gay Bullying

By Brandon Miller -

As a gay Jew myself, I know the struggle of finding those who are similar. There aren't really that many Jews on the face of the Earth to begin with, so finding Hebrew boys and girls of the LGBT persuasion isn't really an easy thing.
The point that I'm getting at is that Jewish culture doesn't really have a ton of gay infusion, aside from the occasional gossip you hear at bar mitzvahs and other events about so and so's nephew being a faggela. Because of our history of being persecuted, a massive part of our current culture revolves around procreation. So, when I was a kid, I didn't think it possible to meet a Prince Charming, let alone a Prince Moses Hershenbaum.
But today's gay Jewish teens just might see the light at the end of the tunnel, because a few Jewish youth groups have banded together to tell them that anti-gay bullying is not okay. The Coalition of Jewish Teen Leaders has joined a campaign to halt bullying on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in participating organizations. The national endeavor is being spearheaded by Keshet, an LGBT Jew group.
The Coalition of Jewish Teen Leaders is made up of the presidents of the National Federation of Temple Youth (reform Judaism), the B'Nai Brith Youth Organization and the United Synagogue Youth (conservative Judaism). Not only have these leaders pledged to end bullying in their own organizations, but they have pledged to help Keshet find 18,000 signatures as part of the “Jewish Community Pledge to Save Lives.” The number 18 symbolizes life in the Jewish religion.
As part of the response to the highly-publicized suicides of gay teenagers across North America, the Coalition has decided the anti-gay bullying is a vital concern. Each organization has developed resources to help its own members promote inclusive environments. So for all of you gay Jewish teens out there looking for hope, you just might be able to find it in your own communities. And all I have to say is: L'Chaim (to life).

-end-

In Wake of Ruling, Churches Down Under May Discriminate

By Kilian Melloy -

An Australian tribunal has ruled that under existing law, religious organizations may discriminate against gays, British newspaper the Daily Telegraph reported on Dec. 27.

The ruling prompted a civil liberties group to call for an end to exemptions from anti-discrimination laws for religious charities that are funded with taxpayer money. But churches rejoiced in the decision.

The New South Wales Administrative Decisions Tribunal (ADT) had originally found in favor of a gay couple who were denied as foster care parents because of their sexuality and family status, which a religious charity, Wesley Mission Australia, said ran counter to the group’s religious beliefs.

But the ADT was ordered by an appeals court to reconsider. The ADT then said that the standards of existing law were so "singularly undemanding" that they were compelled to rule against the same-sex family.

The clash between gay families wishing to provide safe homes for needy children and anti-gay religious charities charged with placing children into good homes has played out across nations ranging from the United States and England--where religiously run charities have stopped handling adoptions rather than abide by anti-discrimination laws--to Australia, where the new ruling has alarmed civil rights groups such as the Council of Civil Liberties, which expressed a fear that the ruling will mean fewer children are placed in homes and more children will be warehoused in orphanages.

"It’s outrageous," said Cameron Murphy, the head of the Council of Civil Liberties. "If a non-religious organization tried to do this they would be in breach of the law." Added Murphy, "If they want to run a foster care agency they ought to be looking after the best interests of the child, not trying to push their religion on the community."

Wesley Mission Australia is affiliated with Uniting Church, which reportedly faces internal divisions in the wake of the ruling, according to a Dec. 27 AAP article. "From the liberal point of view, there will be parts of the church that will be disappointed with this decision," a church spokesperson told the media. "Generally though, the more conservative side of the church will be happy with the decision."

Another group affiliated with Uniting Church, Uniting Care Burnside, has adopted a policy of non-discrimination, the article said. A similar policy is in place at the state-run Department of Community Services. For this reason, although the tribunal suggested that the law was overly broad and needed to be taken up by legislators, some politicians said that no such fine-tuning would be needed: gay families could simply work with non-religious charities or those who are open and affirming.

The case had been in the courts for seven years before the recent finding.
Kilian Melloy reviews media, conducts interviews, and writes commentary for EDGEBoston, where he also serves as Assistant Arts Editor.
 
-end-

Softball Coaches Out High School Lesbian, Toss Her Off Team

By Kilian Melloy -

Two high school softball coaches in East Texas allegedly confronted a student athlete, harangued her about dating another girl, informed her mother, and threw her off the team. Now the coaches, and the school district, are facing a federal lawsuit from the young woman and her mother--and the school district is claiming that the coaches were compelled by law to out the girl to her mother, reported the Dallas Voice on Dec. 23.

The suit, filed Dec. 20 by the Texas Civil Rights Project, identifies the high schooler as S.W., and says that the two coaches, Rhonda Fletcher and Cassandra Newell, detained the girl in a locker room on March 2, 2009, and subjected her to questioning about her sexuality. "The coaches allegedly were angry because S.W. was dating a girl whom Newell may have previously dated," the Dallas Voice article said.

The suit claims, "Fletcher asked S.W. if she was gay, and accused her of having a sexual relationship with another girl. She also claimed that S.W. was spreading gossip about this other girl being ’Coach Newell’s girlfriend.’

"The girl to whom Fletcher was referring had interacted with Newell at a number of school events," the suit adds. "At the time of Fletcher and Newell’s confrontation, S.W. was dating that girl."

The coaches are employed at Kilgore High School in Kilgore, Texas, a community of about 11,000 people. The young women was a sophomore at the school at the time of the incident. The suit alleges that the three invaded the student’s privacy. The suit also names the assistant athletic director, Douglas Duke, and the school district.

A Dec. 22 article at Gawker noted that Newell had once had hopes of playing with the Independent Women’s Football League, and reported, "It’s not clear whether the other girl actually was Newell’s girlfriend, or whether Newell is herself gay," and adds that the coaches pressured S.W. to disclose her sexuality to her mother or else face being left out of that night’s softball game.

However, the coaches allegedly proceeded to phone S.W.’s mother and arrange to have her meet them at Kilgore High School, where they allegedly outed the girl to her mother. The lawsuit asserts that upon telling the student’s mother that S.W. was dating another girl, "Newell offered her the contact information for this ’girlfriend.’ She retrieved the phone number from her cell phone." After the meeting with S.W.’s mother, they cut the student athlete from the team.

The suit asserts that S.W.’s mother was "in shock after learning that her daughter had been confronted alone about her sexuality by two teachers who she was supposed to trust," reported Courthouse News Service on Dec. 22.

Gawker said that the girl’s mother had made repeated complaints about the way the coaches had treated her daughter, all to no avail. The suit recounted that school officials "did nothing to investigate or discipline Fletcher and Newell, and did not even inform [the student’s mother] about the possibility of filing a formal complaint until five months later. No disciplinary action was taken against Fletcher or Newell, effectively ratifying and condoning their behavior."

"We feel confident we handled it the right way," the superintendent of the school district, Jody Clements, told local newspaper the Houston Press. "But that’s why there is a legal system. We’ll proceed and let the courts decide what was right."

Lawyer Jim Harrington told the media that S.W. "is remarkably strong and resilient, especially considering this happened in East Texas." Added the Civil Rights Project attorney, "Who knows what would’ve happened if that wasn’t the case, and that’s actually what motivated [the girl and her mother] to come forward." Harrington spoke against the way the school district views the situation, saying, "We want to change the way they do business in Kilgore. They have to learn to respect the rights of the students."

The suit says that having been locked in a room with the two teachers constituted "de facto seizure of SW’s person and an unreasonable restraint on SW’s liberty to leave this hostile environment," and alleges that the young woman’s emotional state and her schoolwork suffered as a result. "Their unconstitutional and unethical action caused S.W. severe mental and emotional anguish, resulted in social isolation, and robbed her of the freedom to deal with her sexuality privately, at her own pace and on her own terms," according to the student’s mother.

The young woman’s mother related that the "formal justification [Kilgore ISD] provided for Fletcher and Newell’s nonconsensual disclosure of SW’s sexual orientation was that they were ’legally obligated to share this information with the parent,’ " Courthouse News Service reported. "In other words, KISD’s policy mandates that teachers disclose students’ sexual orientation to their parents."

Added the youth’s mother, "Fletcher, Newell, and KISD have absolutely no legitimate state interest in the disclosure of students’ sexual orientation to parents. Doing so is a severe and traumatic violation of students’ privacy, and lacks any legitimate academic, disciplinary, or administrative purpose."
Kilian Melloy reviews media, conducts interviews, and writes commentary for EDGEBoston, where he also serves as Assistant Arts Editor.
 
-end-

Reclaiming the Pro-Family Label

 The Family Research Council (FRC), a hate group that spreads demonizing lies about gay men and lesbians, claims that it’s simply a pro-family organization.
But don’t gay men and lesbians have families, too?  Don’t their families count?
We recently received an email from a supporter that raised just this issue.  With his permission, we’re sharing it here.  It’s one of the many letters, emails, postings and tweets we’ve received in support of our work since we’ve exposed the FRC’s hateful lies.

-Richard Cohen

Dear SPLC,

Thank you, thank you, thank you for finally branding the Family Research Council a hate group.  I am a 36-year-old gay man and when I hear these people say they are "pro-family" or for "family values," I want to scream at the top of my lungs, "I have a family too!  I have a mother and father and brother and sister and a partner, and they love me and I am part of that family! I am not a threat to that family; I am a full-fledged, cooperating member of that family!"

These hateful groups have so appropriated the idea of "family" we barely blink when we hear their exclusionary discourse; they are timeworn at this point. But when you sit and think about this way of describing gay people (a threat to "family"), it starts to sink in that this is one of the most intimate and emotionally violent forms of social oppression.  Homophobia seeks to literally wedge itself between gay people and their parents and siblings.  It also seeks to second-guess and demonize the loving relationships that gay people form between each other.

I have been lucky enough to find the love of my life.  It's a rare gift in this world, to find another person who feels like home, who makes you smile, just by being themselves. There is so much more laughter and joy in my life because of him. I feel so blessed to have found this man.  And how frightening that the FRC would call that love "sickness," "disorder," "perversion" and "sin." Not only would they label it as such, they would try to convince me to put myself through a process of self-denying psychological torture ("conversion therapy") that could endanger my long-term mental health in order to pry me apart from my partner and destroy what they call "sickness."

I'm writing to you in hopes that my words show you the emotional impact your heroic defense of gay people has on the lives of actual gay people. Homophobia literally seeks to strike "close to home," and because of your actions my home and my family feel a little bit safer. Tonight I'll give an extra hug to my boyfriend on your behalf.

Sincerely,
David Hanbury

-end-

DADT Comments by FRC’s Perkins Echo Old Racist Fears

Congressional repeal of the U.S. military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, which will allow gay men and lesbians to serve in the armed forces without having to hide their orientation, has set off waves of condemnation among anti-gay opponents who predict all measure of doom and disaster for the military and America. Yet it serves us well to recall a decision that put an end to another unjust policy steeped in fear and prejudice rather than fact and logic.
Harry Truman, who grew up in Missouri as the grandson of former slaveholders, was “conditioned to be a racist,” according to historian Michael Gardner. Yet by issuing presidential executive orders 9980 and 9981 on July 26, 1948, Truman staked his reputation on his conviction that racial integration of the military (and the federal workforce) was the right thing to do. It didn’t matter to him that a 1948 Gallup poll revealed that 82 percent of Americans disagreed with his civil rights program. He wasn’t deterred that an election was less than 100 days away – one that featured Strom Thurmond running on the overtly segregationist Dixiecrat ticket. And his resolve wasn’t shaken when five-star General Omar Bradley declared the Army “was no place for social experiments.”
Truman courageously challenged long-entrenched attitudes about race – held by people both inside and outside the military – that were so widely accepted as to be considered conventional wisdom. “The Army is not a sociological laboratory,” said Col. Eugene Householder of the Adjutant General’s Office, in a speech before the Conference of Negro Editors and Publishers during World War II. Experimenting with Army policy, especially in a time of war, would pose “a danger to efficiency, discipline and morale and would result in an ultimate defeat.”
Consider a statement issued by the Navy General Board in 1942. “Men on board ship live in particularly close association; in their messes, one man sits beside another; their hammocks or bunks are close together; in their common tasks they work side by side; and in particular tasks such as those of a gun's crew, they form a closely knit, highly coordinated team. How many white men would choose, of their own accord, that their closest associates in sleeping quarters, at mess, and in a gun’s crew should be of another race? How many would accept such conditions, if required to do so, without resentment and just as a matter of course? The General Board believes that the answer is ‘Few, if any,’ and further believes that if the issue were forced, there would be a lowering of contentment, teamwork and discipline in the service.”
Georgia Sen. Richard B. Russell delivered a bitter floor speech shortly before Truman’s announcement. “[T]he mandatory intermingling of the races throughout the services will be a terrific blow to the efficiency and fighting power of the armed services,” he said. “It is sure to increase the numbers of men who will be disabled through communicable diseases. It will increase the rate of crime committed by servicemen.”
Today, aware as we are of decades of noble service by African Americans alongside their white peers in the armed services, the fears expressed in 1948 seem incredibly, almost inconceivably, ignorant. It’s hard to believe our own parents or grandparents lived through such an unenlightened time – or perhaps even shared those fears.
But maybe it isn’t so inconceivable. Many of us today are just as capable of colossal ignorance fueled by childish, groundless fears. On Saturday, Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, had this to say about the repeal of DADT: “Today is a tragic day for our armed forces. The American military exists for only one purpose – to fight and win wars. Yet it has now been hijacked and turned into a tool for imposing on the country a radical social agenda. This may advance the cause of reshaping social attitudes regarding human sexuality, but it will only do harm to the military’s ability to fulfill its mission.”
If there is a tragedy at work here today, it is the implicit lack of respect that Perkins and his brethren have for the maturity and professionalism of our nation’s armed forces – straight and gay service members alike. Just as racists did in 1948, Perkins presumes American troops are so small-minded and fretful that they would allow petty fears about the individual fighting alongside them to detract them from their primary mission: the safety and defense of the nation. Truman believed in the loyalty, patriotism and competence of all service members of all races – and that confidence has been borne out by the incontrovertible evidence that has accumulated since. The same will prove true of service members of all sexual orientations.
The military remains the purest meritocracy in America, so much so that the fears expressed by Truman’s critics seem pathetic 62 years later. I have no doubt that in a far shorter span of time, young Americans will be similarly amazed that comments like Perkins’ were ever taken seriously.

-end-

Monday, December 27, 2010

Prince Edward Island: Five Reasons to Love Canada’s Smallest Province

By Ed Salvato -

How rare it is to personally witness the birth of a gay-friendly destination. But I recently had that thrilling experience. In fact, you could say I was one of the midwives, ushering in the latest rainbow-swaddled baby, Prince Edward Island.

Prince Edward Island, or P.E.I. as it’s known to friends, is the smallest of Canada’s provinces, an island counting only 140,000 inhabitants, which built its first bridge to the mainland only thirteen years ago. You could say it’s slow to reach out to its neighbors. However, when P.E.I. does embrace new people, it does it with gusto.

So it has done with the LGBT travel segment. P.E.I. recently launched GayPEI, a gay tourism association which brings together hotels, restaurants, attractions, tour agencies, and others interested in warmly welcoming lesbian and gay travelers to the island.

P.E.I. invited yours truly and Jeff Guaracino, a fellow gay travel expert to speak about the advantages of gay tourism to the larger tourism association, TIAPEI.

(You can read the entirety of our talk (which made headline news in the provincial paper) by clicking here.)

These, and many other baby steps, are important for LGBT travelers to know. But what may be most important is that, as with all visitors, Prince Edward Island is a friendly island known for its fresh seafood (P.E.I. mussels, anyone?), farm-to-table cuisine, gorgeous untrammeled scenery, and cozy historic B&Bs.

In short, P.E.I. is an island that feels a bit cut off in a good way for folks who want to escape without going too far.

Here are a few of our (new) favorite things.


  

Homes away from home

I stayed at the stately Shipwright Inn, a historic, gay-friendly B&B (with tasty homemade breakfasts that included blueberry pancakes and fresh strips of bacon) run by a British ex-pat husband and wife team. Two lovely gay-owned, gay-operated properties where you’ll feel very comfortable include Rainbow Lodge, probably a good choice for value seekers and the Cranford Inn, a four and a half star contemporary B&B, run by a a fabulous lesbian couple.


  

Mussel worship

P.E.I. is justifiably known for its seafood, including its world-renown eponymous mussels. Indulge yourself! But don’t neglect the oysters and other seafood. It’s almost hard to find a bad meal here.

Off Broadway Restaurant comes highly recommended by Charlottetown foodies as much for its intimate atmosphere and fine service to its mouthwatering cuisine.


  

Drink up

Upstairs from Off Broadway is 42nd Street Lounge, which was Charlottetown’s first martini bar when it opened in ’98. It’s a great place to re-cap your day over a strong, inexpensive libation.

A popular, vibrant alternative is the more raucous Gahan House, a brewer of handcrafted ales. A terrific spot for a beer (or three), it also offers tasty pub food.

Get out

For a tiny island with just over 140,000 souls there is a surprising number of activities, sites, culture, and history to explore. In fact, P.E.I. is known as the birthplace of Canada’s Confederation because in 1864, the provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario and Québec met in Charlottetown to form the new nation.

And of course Anne of Green Gables is one of the island’s most important tourism draws.

The island’s strongest suit is probably the outdoors, with cycling, hiking, autumn leaf-peeping, and beach-going among the most enjoyable activities.

Surprisingly the waters surrounding the island are among the warmest north of North Carolina so in the summer pack your bathing suit. There’s also an unofficial nude beach - Blooming Point with its ten miles of white sand - popular with local and visiting gay women and men.

More Information

Tourism Prince Edward Island (PEI)
http://www.tourismpei.com

Ed Salvato is a gay travel expert, editor, and writer. He recently joined OutThink Partners, a strategic marketing and communications agency specializing in the LGBT travel segment, as managing director of their New York City office.
-end-

Freddie Ljungberg ‘proud’ of gay gossip

Swedish football star Freddie Ljungberg says he is “proud” of the rumours he is gay.

The 33-year-old player has been the subject of gossip about his sexuality for years, due to his bachelor lifestyle and love of musicals and fashion.
He told the New York Times: “There’s been a gay rumour for a long time. I don’t mind at all. I am proud of that. I love fashion, and I think so many gay people have amazing style. So that is a compliment to me.”

He added: “I really don’t know why people are so interested. I just made a decision that I won’t talk about it.”

The Calvin Klein underwear model is frequently been ranked one of football’s gay favourites, alongside David Beckham and Cristiano Ronaldo.

But reacting to one accolade in 2006, he said: “I am not gay. If I was I would just say I was and it wouldn’t bother me.”






-end-

UK Government to begin process to erase convictions for historic gay sex offences

UK Prime Minister David Cameron
The government is to set to begin the process to introduce legislation to wipe convictions for historical gay sex offences within days. The policy was first announced during the general election campaign by prime minister David Cameron in an article for PinkNews.co.uk.
The Sunday Telegraph reports that Lynne Featherstone, the Liberal Democrat equalities minister, will announce firm proposals for the legislation within days as part of the Freedom Bill.
In 1967, consensual gay sex was decriminalised in England and Wales for males over the age of 21, it took until 1980 for decriminalisation in Scotland and 1982 for decriminalisation in Northern Ireland.
In 1994, the age of consent for gay men was reduced from 21 to 18, and in 2000, it was reduced further to 16, equalising with the age of consent for straight people.
However, these changes in the law were not retrospective, so there are a considerable number of people who are required to disclose that they have a criminal record for a sexual offence, despite the action that they took part in being completely legal now.
These convictions need to be disclosed when applying for certain jobs and even for volunteering in hospitals or with children as they will be listed on a person’s Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) certificate.
The announcement followed a question submitted by a PinkNews.co.uk reader in a Questions and Answer session with the Conservative leader published in April. Mr Cameron wrote on PinkNews.co.uk “We will change the law so that any past convictions for consensual homosexual sexual activities, which have since become lawful, will be treated as spent, and will not be disclosed on a criminal record check when applying for a job. This is a question of justice – and it’s right that we should change the law and wipe the slate clean.”
Although a rule passed in 2003 does mean that people convicted of now legal consensual sex are no longer listed on the Sex Offenders Register, the conviction remained on any individual’s criminal record. Mr Cameron proposes that an amendment to the Exceptions Order to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act means these convictions will no longer show up on a CRB check by classing them as ‘spent convictions.’
In an article for PinkNews.co.uk, Mr Cameron wrote: “I believe heart and soul in equality: the whole idea of prejudice towards people on the basis of their sexuality is quite wrong and that’s why I back civil partnerships, why I told the Tory conference that commitment through marriage was equally valid whether between a man and a woman, a man and a man or a woman and a woman – and it’s why a Conservative government will put new rules in place to tackle homophobia and support gay couples.

“Despite this, I am aware that there will remain some doubters. But have no fear: the Party has changed, the changes we have made are supported by those serving in my team and those changes are lasting. So far as I am concerned, it is one of the touchstone issues that define the modern Conservative Party.”
A review for the Home Office by Sunita Mason earlier in the year recommended that there should be a change in the law, but then home secretary Alan Johnson refused to pledge to do so. In a House of Commons statement he wrote: “This is a complex area, but once again I am anxious to ensure that the disclosure process is proportionate and I will be asking officials to look at this further.”
Liberal Democrat ministers are expected to lead the progress of the Freedom Bill in order to give the party a perceived ‘win’ in the face of the embarrassment caused by business secretary Vince Cable and other ministers over the past week.

-end-

Jim Carrey speaks out against homophobic bullies

Jim Carrey who played a man who came out of the closet in the film ‘I Love You Philip Morris’ has spoken out against bullies who target victims on the basis of their sexuality.
“This is a horrible thing to be bullied, and to feel like an outcast is a terrible thing,” the star said. “It’s just so an old thing, an old antiquated way of thinking that you can’t have any more. It doesn’t belong in the new paradigm.
“Every time you look at somebody and think, ‘I don’t like that about that person,’ you just got to know that’s about you,” he added.
“Anybody who bullies anybody for any reason is no friend of mine. Frankly, I can’t imagine hitting a human being for any reason except self-preservation, if I was attacked. Your sensibilities are different when you’re a school kid and there’s gang mentality, but it ain’t cool.
“Some of the most valuable people in my life are gay.
“People that bring magical, amazing gifts and contributions to my life. I would say to kids out there when they’re engaging in these kinds of isolations of people, someday you’re going to want those people in your life. You’re going to need those people in your life, and you’re not going to want that on your conscience.”

-end-

For Transgendered, 10 Reasons Why 2010 Was a Watershed Year

Dr. Sherman Leis
Dr. Sherman Leis 
By Sherman Leis -

Dr. Sherman Leis, founder of the Philadelphia Center for Transgender Surgery, lists the reasons why he believes that 2010 was a watershed year for the transgender community.

1) A growing number of female-to-male (FTM) transitions.

Once only thought to be the province of males transitioning to females (MTF), a recent study showed that the transitioned male and female populations will equal each other within the next five years.

2) Growing acceptance of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) as a credible medical condition, instead of mistaking it to be a psychological disorder or perversion.

3) More conventional healthcare insurance policies are including transgender surgery and health needs in coverage, regardless of whether Obamacare is implemented or not.

4) The transgender community is gaining momentum to stand on its own and getting out from under the umbrella of the gay and lesbian community, except when it comes to fighting for human rights and dignity.

5) The U.S. is becoming a world center for transgender surgery as more trans patients from around the world are coming here for surgery. Although Asia and Europe still perform more trans surgeries overall, the growth trend is in favor of the United States.

6) More seniors are having transgender surgery. As society becomes more accepting, more seniors are making the commitment to realize their lifelong dream, including this one, the "world’s oldest transgender."

7) The most commonly performed surgical procedure for Male-To-Female transgender patients continues to be genital reassignment, although facial feminization procedures are a close second.

8) The most commonly performed surgical procedure for Female-To-Male transgender patients is breast removal and masculinization of the chest.

9) New medical innovations, such as micro surgery, the harmonic scalpel, radio-wave surgery, improved flap techniques, and new bio-medical materials like cellular dermal matrix products, will continue to make transgender surgery safer, with more realistic and functional results.

10) Trans people are becoming more accepted into pop culture, ads, TV shows, music, politics etc.

The Philadelphia Center For Transgender Surgery, in suburban Bala Cynwyd, Penn., is recognized as one of the leading facilities in the world specializing in gender reassignment surgery, including specialists: surgeons, psychologists, endocrinologists, aestheticians, speech therapists, legal experts, and others. 

-end-

NYT’s Dowd on the Love Story of Patti Smith and Robert Mapplethorpe

By Karen Ocamb -
NYT columnist Maureen Dowd
I confess I’m am less an avid fan of New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd than of her colleague Frank Rich, an LGBT hero.  But Dowd’s 1994 cover story for POZ magazine on Mary Fisher, the Republican straight woman with HIV/AIDS who was the compassionate counterpart to the ugly hate of Patrick Buchanan at the 1992 GOP convention, still stands as a monumental work capturing both Fisher and the times.
So out of curiosity, I dipped into Dowd’s Sunday column “Because the Night Belongs to Her” and found a couple of surprises. First, though she uses a million dollar word to say it (“lacunae”), Dowd admits that there was a gap in her cultural awareness of iconic 70s punk rock singer Patti Smith – and then she writes about the startling pleasure filling that gap by reading Smith’s memoir Just Kids, which won a National Book Award last month. Rather than delighting in being cleverly snarky, the trait for which she is best known in political circles, Dowd delights in being surprised and sharing that with us.
She writes:
“For anyone who has had a relationship where the puzzle pieces seem perfect but don’t fit — so, all of us — “Just Kids” is achingly beautiful. It’s “La Bohème” at the Chelsea Hotel; a mix, she writes, of “Funny Face” and “Faust,” two hungry artists figuring out whom to love, how to make art and when to part.”
The other surprise for me was the relationship between Smith and gay photographer Robert Mapplethorpe, which I didn’t know about either. In the mid-70s, I was leading a double life: supposedly straight journalist “by day” and serious alcoholic and drug addict at night. I think I remember watching Patti Smith scream her poetry at CBGBs or Max’s Kansas City – but then, I may have only planned to do that and hung out with the punk drug-addicts in lower Manhattan instead. Now, after reading Dowd’s column, I want to get Smith’s memoir to see what I missed by being there but being so out of it that I wasn’t “there” at all. But it was all mixed up and hazy back then, so I’m glad to have someone fill in the “lacunae” in my memory.
Here’s Dowd:
Smith describes the wondrous odyssey of taking the bus from South Jersey and meeting a curly-haired soul mate who wanted to help her soar, even as the pair painfully grappled over the years with Mapplethorpe’s sexuality and his work’s brutality.
“Robert took areas of dark human consent and made them into art,” Smith writes about the former altar boy from Floral Park, Queens, who was bedeviled by Catholic concepts of good and evil. “Robert sought to elevate aspects of male experience, to imbue homosexuality with mysticism.”
When he began exploring his own desires in San Francisco, she said it was an education for her too.
“I had thought a man turned homosexual when there was not the right woman to save him, a misconception I had developed from the tragic union of Rimbaud and the poet Paul Verlaine,” she writes, adding that she mistakenly considered homosexuality “a poetic curse” that “irrevocably meshed with affectation and flamboyance.”
As they redefined their love, she writes, “I learned from him that often contradiction is the clearest way to truth.”


-end-

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Prominent Jesuit Scholar Accused of Abuse

By Kristina Chew -

The sexual abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Church has reached a “degree we could not have imagined," according to a statement made by Pope Benedict XVI  on Monday that was quoted the December 20th New York Times.

Indeed: Just recently, a prominent Jesuit scholar, Keith Pecklers, SJ,  was accused by 48-year-old Keith Brennan of sexual abuse, as reported in the December 12th Star-Ledger.

Pecklers is a professor of liturgy at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome and widely regarded as one of the foremost authorities on Catholic liturgy in the world. He is also a frequent commentator on Vatican Affairs for ABC News. Pecklers is a native of Jersey City and it was in St. Paul’s Church in the Greenville section of Jersey City that then-14-year-old Brennan was abused by him starting in 1976.

In a December 5th story, the Star-Ledger also reported about how John J. Myers, the Archbishop of Newark, shielded at least four priests who had been accused of sexual abuse against children and one adult:

In the four instances, the priests have either admitted improper sexual contact, pleaded guilty to crimes stemming from accusations of sexual misconduct or been permanently barred from ministry by the archdiocese after allegations of sexual misconduct. 

In his Christmas message to the Vatican hierarchy, the Pope wrote that
“We must ask ourselves what we can do to repair as much as possible the injustice that has occurred.......We must ask ourselves what was wrong in our proclamation, in our whole way of living the Christian life, to allow such a thing to happen.”

In the past year, investigations in Ireland, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and the United States have found that clerics from parish priests to those at high levels like Fr. Pecklers, committed sexual abuse against children in many cases. And in many if not most cases, the church hierarchy covered up the abuse, sometimes moving priests with a history of sexually abusing children from parish to parish, and without informing parishioners of the priests' history.


In his Christmas letter, even though the Pope states that '“We are well aware of the particular gravity of this sin committed by priests and of our corresponding responsibility,”' he also says that the abuses should be viewed 'in the context of these times."'

But rather than blaming 'these times' for the catalogue of abuses committed around the world, should not the Pope be looking at the culture of the Roman Catholic Church, a culture that, indeed, shielded and continues to shield---to protect---clerics who committed terrible crimes? As a July 8 editorial from the National Catholic Reporter states, the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church is 'as it has evolved in the past half millennium is deeply damaged from within.'


Earlier this year, the Vatican revised its law on sexual abuse, a step in the right direction----but a step that seems to be not only too little, but too, too late.

-end-

Minnesota's Sean Simonsen: Transforming Catholic Hearts and Minds on Gay Rights

By Michael A. Jones -

Earlier this year, a high school student in Minnesota penned a heartfelt and deeply moving missive, "Life as a Gay Teen," in his Catholic school's newspaper. In the piece, Simonsen confronted the homophobic work of many bishops in Minnesota, who actually spent nearly a million dollars this year sending out a DVD to Catholic families blasting same-sex couples. Simonsen, talking about the reality of being gay in a Catholic community, noted that homophobic messages like this directly lead to LGBT youth feeling immoral, wrong, or out of place in society.
"Every day you hear someone use your sexuality -- a part of you that, no matter how desperately you try, you cannot change -- as a negative adjective. That hurts," Simonsen wrote in the piece. "Politicians are allowed to debate your right to marry the person you love or your right to be protected from hate crimes under the law. Your faith preaches your exclusion -- or damnation."
Simonsen's school originally ran the piece in the online version of the school newspaper. But as Maia Spotts wrote here last month, it didn't stay up for very long. School administrators pulled the piece down, and as a result seemed to silence the powerful voice of a young LGBT Catholic. Sure, the piece eventually turned up in other outlets, but it was no longer allowed to be featured at Simonsen's school.
So how does this story turn out? Surprisingly, really well.
Simonsen and his mother spoke to Minnesota Public Radio this week, one month after the incident, and noted that despite some worries, the piece actually spurred some amazing conversations in their school, their community, and their family and friends.
"I got one handwritten letter left for me in the main office from a teacher. And then I got like three or four emails from teachers basically saying they support me," Sean Simonsen said. "It was teachers I wasn't close to and so that kind of surprised me." He added that more teachers told him the whole fracas was worth it, because the school will emerge stronger and more inclusive.
Sean's mother, Ann, said that though she was initially worried that her son might become a target for bullies, she was overwhelmed by the level of support that came in from their friends, neighbors and acquaintances.
"I even had to take a couple days off just to respond to the all the emails and phone calls I'd received from friends," she said. "It was just ringing off the hook. It was quite amazing. You find out who your friends are, that's for sure."
And then comes the best part of the whole story. Sean's classmates? Earlier this month, they voted Sean to be Grand Knight (which is equivalent to prom king) for the high school winter formal. That's right, Catholic students all voted for the gay guy to represent them, and this despite the institutional Catholic Church's continued insistence that gay people are less than their straight peers.
Now that's what you call justice.
Meanwhile, even though the school newspaper never republished Sean's article, they did institute a new policy that should prevent them from having to take down articles in the future.
Kudos to Minnesota, for showing in so many ways that Catholics in the pews believe that equal rights for LGBT people can be consistent with their faith.

-end-

Utah Grandfather Says Addressing Anti-Gay Bullying Should Start in Elementary School

By Michael A. Jones -

Leonard Ridley is quickly becoming the most popular grandfather in the country. The Utah resident, a retired social worker, has decided that if elementary schools in his town won't address the subject of anti-gay bullying with students, then he's not going to sit around and let silence prevail. So what did Ridley do?
As we mentioned earlier this month, Ridley decided to put pen-to-posterboard and make some signs that he could put in his front yard which, conveniently, sits right across from a school. The messages that those signs carry? Pretty simple and sweet: "Tell the truth." "Stop Gay Suicide." "Gays Are Born Gay."
Nothing too controversial about those signs, right? Not if you talk to local school officials, who fear that the signs are inappropriate for children below the sixth grade. They want Ridley to remove the signs, and called him into their office recently to lecture him about the "inappropriateness" of telling youth that people are born gay.
Ridley is not backing down.
According to QSaltLake, which interviewed Ridley this week, he's keeping the signs up in order to make sure that kids get the message somewhere that it's not OK to bully people based on sexual orientation.
"I think it is a life or death issue, and I think it’s the most serious issue homosexuals face because of that,” said Ridley. "[There is a] wall of silence around the prevalence of gay suicides."
Administrators, however, see the subject a bit differently. They think Ridley's signs cross the line, and though they can't force him to take the signs down, they're making their opposition pretty clear, in an official statement from a district spokesperson.
“The District is very concerned about the content of the signs and it’s not that his beliefs are different from other people’s. It’s that the content is adult in nature,” said the spokesperson. “It discusses suicide specifically which is something that we don’t discuss at the elementary level.”
So saying that gay people are born gay, and that suicide is a bad thing, is inappropriate for elementary school kids to hear? Talk about a tragic position to take given that students as young as 11-years-old have taken their lives in recent years after being bullied because of their perceived sexual orientation.
And as Ridley makes crystal clear, anti-gay rhetoric takes place on the playgrounds of elementary schools. If left unchecked, that anti-gay rhetoric can turn into bullying, which can turn terribly tragic.
“I’m aware that what you find in grammar school is hostile teasing concerning gays and it escalates to outright bullying by junior high and can become more severe by senior high,” he said.
Which is why he's not willing to take the signs down, despite what school administrators say. To stop the cycle of violence that is LGBT bullying, you have to start somewhere, and that somewhere is with elementary school kids.
Pretty cool grandfather, eh?

-end-

Ricky Martin considering adoption

Ricky Martin says he is considering adopting a child.

The star, who came out this year, already is already a father to twin sons he had with a surrogate mother.

Martin was appearing on CBS programme A Home for the Holidays, which raises awareness of adoption and children who need a loving home.

He told presenter Terri Seymour: “Even though I started with surrogacy, adoption is probably my next step.”

He added: “I had to be here as a father… 20,000 children have been beautifully impacted by this project. Adoption is beautiful. Give it a try!”

-end-

The End of LGBT Bookstores: A New Era for Equality?

By Andrew Belonsky -

Outloud, a gay bookstore in Nashville, announced last week that they will be closing their doors after 15 years of service, making them the latest LGBT literary emporium to go out of business in the recent past.
This and other cessations are symptomatic of our nation's economic malaise, and an illustration of how large companies have squeezed out the little guy.
"The greed of some in the banking industry continues to push interest rates so high that most small businesses can't afford them. Affordable credit is simply not available to most small business owners." OutLoud owners Ted Jensen and Kevin Medley asserted in their outgoing message, which revolved largely around the monetary matters at hand. "Supersized businesses like Amazon, Wal-Mart and Best Buy have unfair price advantages over locally-owned businesses."
Surely big business has squeezed out the little guy, gay and straight alike, but not everyone sees the closings as necessarily negative.
Deacon Maccubbin, founder of Washington DC's long-running bookstore Lambda Rising, also had to shutter his beloved business this year. Instead of fretting, though, he saw the end as an achievement.
"The phrase 'mission accomplished' has gotten a bad rap in recent years, but in this case, it certainly applies," he said last January. "When we set out to establish Lambda Rising in 1974, it was intended as a demonstration of the demand for gay and lesbian literature. We thought... we could encourage the writing and publishing of LGBT books, and sooner or later other bookstores would put those books on their own shelves and there would be less need for a specifically gay and lesbian bookstore. Today, 35-years later, nearly every general bookstore carries LGBT books..."
Suddenly the dollars and cents of these businesses appears to be something else: a much larger discussion over whether it's best to have a "gay only" space safe from a sometimes hostile world? Or would it be better if gay become blasé, and we were fully integrated in the culture at large? Does self-segregation serve a purpose, or should the end goal be complete, seamless assimilation?
At their inception, gay bookstores weren't simply about wordsmiths. They were an organic outgrowth of a repressed culture, the manifestation of a collective need and want; they were part of a revolution.
In fact, New York's first LGBT bookstore, the Oscar Wilde Bookshop, opened in 1967, two blocks down from the famed Stonewall Inn, and proved integral to the city's -- and by consequence the world's -- gay rights movement. It was as much a meeting place where ideas were exchanged as it was a simple shop. Like the other outposts mentioned here, Oscar Wilde has also closed, swallowed up by larger conglomerates who have made our media interest into their business.
Social conservatives have successfully merged their "traditional values" with the more timely fiscal conservatism, and Republican leaders from Sen. Jim DeMint to Rep. Mike Pence are touting a policy that paints "moral erosion," like gay equality, as part of the economic downturn. "As we seek to build national wealth, we must renew our commitment to the institutions that nurture the character of our people -- traditional family and religion," said Pence in a speech this month.
The closures of OutLoud, Lambda Rising and the rest prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that LGBT people aren't fringe at all. We're mainstream precisely because we're struggling under the same recession as the rest of America. It's not a gay, straight or omnisexual situation. And, as hard as the economic realities may be, perhaps the realization that everyone's in the same boat can help alleviate some of the culture war tensions.
We're here, we're queer, and we're part of the economy, and LGBT politics aside, if we want to prevent a world of utter conformity and mass production, then the nation as a whole needs to support the small businesses that made this nation great in the first place.

Andrew Belonsky is a journalist living in New York City. 
-end-

Legal ruling will allow gay men to adopt partner’s child

“This is a big step for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community in Israel,” commented lawyer Irit Rosenblum.

A breakthrough legal ruling in the Jerusalem Family Court on Thursday will pave the way for homosexuals to officially adopt their partner’s or spouse’s child, the Tel Aviv-based New Family organization told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

“This is a big step for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community in Israel,” commented lawyer Irit Rosenblum, executive director of New Family, an organization that champions the rights of Israelis to marry and build families outside the traditional system.
 

 “However, there is still a long road to the desired recognition, since each issue pertaining to gay rights is decided by the courts, and not by the legislature.”

Rosenblum, who submitted the request for adoption on behalf of the couple, told the Post that before this particular petition, no male homosexual had applied to legally adopt his partner’s child.

She pointed out that unlike in the past, surrogacy has succeeded in creating a new situation for gay couples, in which a man can become a single parent.


In this precedent-setting case, the child in question was born two years go to a man via a surrogate mother in India.

About a year ago, the father asked to allow his partner to adopt the child.

The two men went through the standard adoption process – including a review from a social worker, who assessed the partner to be a fit parent and submitted a positive recommendation to the Jerusalem Family Court.

But because there was no precedent for this type of adoption, however, the court did not immediately approve it. At that point, Rosenblum got involved and presented their case to the court, which finally ruled that the partner could legally adopt the child.

Referring to Thursday’s ruling, Rosenblum said that while it was a great step, “it is just not enough that such decisions depend only on liberal judges and not on the basis of solid legislation.”

“[This precedent] emphasizes a much bigger issue in Israel: that such decisions are based on the attitudes of certain judges and not on the rule of law,” said Rosenblum, highlighting a case six months ago of Jerusalem resident Dan Goldberg, a homosexual father of twins born to a surrogate mother in India.

After being denied entry to Israel with his children, Goldberg and his partner were forced to live in a Mumbai hotel for months after the babies were born because Jerusalem Family Court Judge Philip Marcus initially refused to authorize a standard paternity test to determine if he was the biological father of the children.

The matter was resolved only after the media reported the case and the family appealed to President Shimon Peres for help.

“This was a decision that was made by the same court regarding the rights of gay couples,” said Rosenblum, adding “it is true that the minute one judge is breaks through and is brave enough to make a decision on such issues, then other judges will come forward, too, but it’s just not enough. These basic rights must be set in law to ensure that everyone can enjoy them.”

In 2007, the Supreme Court allowed two men to jointly adopt a child that was not related to either of them.


-end-

Wisconsin's Gov. Doyle asks court to declare domestic partner registry constitutional

Tamara Packard, left, and Renee Herber
leave the Dane County Clerk’s Office
after signing up for the state’s new
domestic partner registry in Madison.
By MARY SPICUZZA -


An attorney for Gov. Jim Doyle has filed a motion asking that the domestic partner registry be declared constitutional.
The motion, filed Wednesday in Dane County Circuit Court, aims to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the registry's opponents. That challenge, filed earlier this year by a social conservative group, argues the registry is a violation of the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.
The group, Wisconsin Family Action, argues the registry creates a legal status substantially similar to that of marriage.
Doyle proposed the registry as a way to grant same-sex couples more legal rights, such as the right to visit each other in hospitals, make end-of-life decisions and inherit each other's property.
The Democratic-controlled Legislature approved the registry and it went into effect in August 2009. By the end of the year 1,329 couples had signed up.
The same-sex marriage ban, supported by the same group bringing this lawsuit, was added to the constitution by voters in 2006.
Doyle's attorney, Lester Pines, said his recent motion highlights the difference between marriage and domestic partnerships.

-end-

Self-Care for Activists Post-DADT and the DREAM Act

By Keiko Lane -

Keiko Lane
I read the first tweet last week: Lt. Dan Choi, who has been at the visible center of the fight against Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, had been hospitalized because of mental health issues. Yesterday, I was glad to hear that he was better and attended the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal signing ceremony with President Obama.
So this article isn’t really about Lt. Dan Choi, whom I do not know. It is, however, about the energetic and psychological pain and suffering that often accompany a commitment to the ongoing fight for social justice.
Saturday, December 18, brought the long-fought-for repeal of DADT, the Clinton-era policy that allowed gay men and lesbians to serve in the U.S. military as long as they do not disclose their LGBT identities. This is still the case until the law if fully repealed – which will come in a few months.
December 18 also brought the defeat of the DREAM Act, which would have benefited an estimated several hundred thousand young immigrants brought to this country by their parents. The bill would have carved out a clear path to citizenship for them through education or serving in the military.
And yet that Saturday, as text and calls from my long-time activist friends and colleagues crisscrossed the country, we acknowledged the ways that both the DREAM Act and the DADT repeal are highly problematic.
How do these policy developments look to those of us who work toward a dream of non-militaristic answers to global struggles over power and resources? While we recognize the important civil rights implications of the DADT repeal, we also view the repeal as a step toward increasing the pool of recruit-able citizens into military service.
The continued defunding of public education and public assistance programs and the shrinking number of available jobs in the crumbling economy leave few options for many young people, other than military service.
Terms of the DREAM Act stipulated that young immigrants, in order to be eligible, must have a clean criminal record and complete two years of higher education or military service. But as we have seen in the battles over the defunding of public university and college systems, completing two years of higher education is increasingly difficult if needed courses are cancelled or offered during the hours these students might be working to help pay for ever-increasing tuition.
We’ve also seen in the fight against SB 1070 (the anti-immigrant “papers-please” law) in Arizona that it is difficult to maintain a clean criminal record when you are constantly targeted and sought out by the police and often considered criminal for resisting that targeting. It is enough to make people feel crazy. In psychotherapeutic terms, we would call this a double bind—also known as “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.”
As problematic as the DREAM Act is, friends and colleagues who teach undergraduate and high schools students were posting to Facebook and Twitter about their students who were depending on the DREAM Act and who live in fear of deportation, even though they may not have ever known life in another country.
Evidenced by SB 1070 and by U.S. history, citizenship is no guarantee against targeting. My family knows something about this.
My grandmother, though Okinawan, was born in the U.S. So were her children. During WWII, under Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, they were rounded up, along with all other Japanese American citizens living on the Pacific Coast, and sent to internment camps. The men were given the options to stay in the camps, to join the U.S. military, or to “return” to Japan, where some of them had never lived.
One of my mother’s uncles joined the Army. He was a member of the 442nd Infantry, the most decorated regiment in U.S. armed forces history. Another uncle refused internment and went to Japan to try to find work. For years after the war, the U.S. government would not allow him to return. He missed out on his sons’ childhoods.
In my psychotherapy practice, I work mostly with LGBTQ social justice activists. Some days I learn of breaking news from them as they enter my office checking their iphones, closing laptops, or reporting on what they’ve recently heard on the radio. Sometimes we sit together in stunned silence, outrage, or grief. Often, the questions they struggle with are about how to sustain themselves emotionally and spiritually when there is so much work to be done.
Those clients whose work leaves them visible within the community fear that taking a break or asking for help is a sign of weakness—that they will be seen as not believing strongly enough in the cause to keep going.
Is that what happened to Lt. Dan Choi? I don’t know. For many months the media referred to him as the “face of the movement to repeal DADT.” And though Lt. Choi has been very vocal about being only one person among many fighting for the repeal, he has been at the visible center. But within hours of the news that he was in the hospital, there were tweets and posts about his “faking it,” or “whining” and “taking a vacation.”
The holiday season can be an especially difficult, diasporic experience for the LGBTQ community. Transgender and genderqueer people whose bodies don’t match their outward appearance, or whose outward appearance doesn’t match with the gender assumptions people make based on their legal names, are often fearful of traveling by plane.
Many of my pre- and non-operative transgender clients are afraid of having their safety jeopardized by agents who, by following the new Transportation Security Administration policies, draw attention to their gender nonconformity.
Immigrants often have to assess whether border-crossing to visit family members will endanger themselves, their families, or their allies. For LGBTQ people who are estranged from their families of origin, the holiday season—so filled with archetypal images of family rituals—can be an isolating reminder of their exile.
This is what I know: We fight because there is always work to do. But the work will never be finished. It’s paradoxical: If we don’t find a way to sustain one another and ourselves through it, we burn out and are no good to anyone. When we get worried about resources—material and energetic—we become suspicious of one another. Within activist communities, that can manifest as suspicion of anyone who doesn’t live and breathe the work every moment. Burnout, fatigue, exhaustion, panic, and overwhelming sorrow are the cyclical result.
While listening to news of DADT and the DREAM Act, I worked on curriculum for a class I teach to psychotherapy interns about the psychodynamics of social justice and the clinical issues that can arise when working with activists. Part of our job as therapists is to help our clients understand the world they live in and make conscious choices about how to use their agency to respond to, resist, and savor their experiences.
As individuals and communities, we must ensure that we have the necessary emotional resources to sustain our work through the long fights still ahead.
Here are a few small things you can do:
  • Take a walk or dance or do yoga or stretch—something to move your body.
  • Remember that you have a body, and spend time feeling what it needs. Then try to do it.
  • Eat and drink whatever will help you feel enlivened and present with yourself.
  • Spend time with those who love you and whom you love.
  • Get more sleep.
  • Ask for help.
  • Offer help to others.
  • Take care of one another.
And especially this – take care of one another. 

-end-